Supreme Court Justice Thomas Notes that Big Tech Cannot Legally Squash Free Speech

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has fired a warning shot over the bow of Big Tech saying that Internet-based services do not have the right to destroy Americans’ free speech.

Thomas made his comments after the court dismissed a case brought against President Donald Trump for blocking people on Twitter. Trump was accused of shutting down free speech by blocking leftists who attacked him on his presidential Twitter account.

But on Monday, the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) dismissed the case as moot because Trump is no longer president and Twitter deleted his account, anyway.

In his decision, Thomas said that the court will probably have to address Big Tech’s cancel culture soon enough and he slammed the assumption of these tech giants that they could silence Americans “at any time for any or no reason.”

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Great American Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“As Twitter made clear, the right to cut off speech lies most powerfully in the hands of private digital platforms,” Justice Thomas wrote in a separate opinion. “The extent to which that power matters for purposes of the First Amendment and the extent to which that power could lawfully be modified raise interesting and important questions.”

Thomas also pointed out that Twitter has such power that it can completely shut anyone down.

The claim in the original case was that Trump was “the government” and if he was blocking Americans, he had the power of government censorship. Thomas, though, disagreed.

“It seems rather odd to say that something is a government forum when a private company has unrestricted authority to do away with it,” Justice Thomas wrote. “The disparity between Twitter’s control and Mr. Trump‘s control is stark, to say the least. Mr. Trump blocked several people from interacting with his messages. Twitter barred Mr. Trump not only from interacting with a few users, but removed him from the entire platform.”

He added, “Today’s digital platforms provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech, including speech by government actors.”

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Warner Todd Huston has been writing editorials and news since 2001 but started his writing career penning articles about U.S. history back in the early 1990s. Huston has appeared on Fox News, Fox Business Network, CNN, and several local Chicago News programs to discuss the issues of the day. Additionally, he is a regular guest on radio programs from coast to coast. Huston has also been a Breitbart News contributor since 2009. Warner works out of the Chicago area, a place he calls a "target rich environment" for political news.
You Might Like


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.