FDA Chief Admits ‘6-Foot-Distancing’ Coronavirus Practice is a Hoax Not Science

Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb admitted last week that this whole “six-feet distancing” practice has no science whatever backing it up.

Worse, he says that the practice has been one of the worst, costliest part of the response to the supposed pandemic.

Gottlieb revealed his position of the practice the same day the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released its updated guidance in which they claimed that we can all go to 3 feet in distance from each other, now.

Speaking on CNBC’s Closing Bell, Gottlieb said the 6-foot social distancing requirement is not “based on clear science.”

take our poll - story continues below

Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?

  • Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Great American Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“The 6-foot distancing requirement has probably been the single costliest mitigation tactic we’ve employed in response to COVID,” Gottlieb told the host.

“And it really wasn’t based on clear science,” he added. “We implemented it early on based on an assumption coronavirus was going to spread like influenza, and there had been some prior research that flu spread predominately through droplets, and if you stated 6 feet apart from people, it reduced droplet transmission.”

But then they found that COVID was spread through droplets and aerosols.

“So, probably 6 feet isn’t as effective as it would be if this was purely droplet transmission,” Gottlieb exclaimed. “I think the fact that we’ve probably over-relied on a flu-based model caused us to under appreciate the role of aerosol transmission, and probably caused us to overestimate contaminated surfaces as a source of spread. It probably caused us to underestimate the utility of high-quality masks in reducing transmission. It probably caused us to overestimate the impact of distancing to 6 feet.”

“We should have re-adjudicated this much earlier,” Gottlieb said.

But even Gottlieb did not note to viewers that the the whole six-feet distancing concept is not built on modern science. It was first conceived by so-called scientists back in the late 1800s, when science was far more like quackery instead of science.

The fact is, this whole nonsense is just that.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Warner Todd Huston has been writing editorials and news since 2001 but started his writing career penning articles about U.S. history back in the early 1990s. Huston has appeared on Fox News, Fox Business Network, CNN, and several local Chicago News programs to discuss the issues of the day. Additionally, he is a regular guest on radio programs from coast to coast. Huston has also been a Breitbart News contributor since 2009. Warner works out of the Chicago area, a place he calls a "target rich environment" for political news.
You Might Like


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.