Liberals claim to be oh so concerned with the safety of children in public schools, but when it comes to taking common sense measures to ensure they are secure and well protected, they vote against them.

The school board of Baltimore City Public Schools voted unanimously to not allow resource officers to be armed on school property.

Hey, while they’re at it, how about hanging a sign outside welcoming armed mass shooters to the school?

Trending: Obama And Hillary Refuse To Call Sri Lanka Victims Christians; Here’s What They Called Them Instead

Good grief.

take our poll - story continues below

Should incarcerated criminals have the right to vote?

• Should incarcerated criminals have the right to vote?  

• Should incarcerated criminals have the right to vote?*
  • Yes, they're still Americans.
  • Yes, non-violent criminals should have the right to vote.
  • No, we can't trust their judgement.
  • Maybe, it depends on the crime committed.
  • Heck no! Criminals have forfeited their right!
• Email*
• Comments
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Great American Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

On Tuesday, the school board voted 10-0 to express disapproval of a bill in the state legislature that would have permitted school resource officers to carry firearms inside school property.

Currently, officers are permitted to carry their service weapons while guarding the exterior of the schools, but are forced to lock up their weapons at the beginning of each school day.

WBAL-TV reported that the SROs are the only officers in the state of Maryland who are not permitted to carry their weapons inside of schools while on duty.

The vote took place at school district headquarters. The highly attended meeting attracted members of a student group who chanted and protested against the bill.

Kimberly Humphrey, a spokesperson for the American Civil Liberties Union, said that armed officers in the building would create a distracting environment.

“[It’s] very important that students are in an environment where they feel safe and comfortable, and having a gun around is not comfortable for learning,” Humphrey said.

Students who oppose SRO’s to be armed in @BaltCitySchools take over board meeting with a list of demands. Chair forced to take a 10 minute break before voting. @wbaltv11 #wbal pic.twitter.com/XJFkihpmix

— Karen Campbell (@KarenCampbellTV) January 22, 2019

So what, exactly, are they going to do to protect students from gun violence? Oh. That’s right. Their idea of protection is violating the Second Amendment rights of law abiding citizens by demanding strict gun control legislation and an eventual ban.

How about no? Mmmmkay?

The Second Amendment exists to protect us from tyranny, which is exactly why a big, bloated government like ours wants to trash it. So they can enforce a radically oppressive agenda. Hard pass.

Armed security guards and teachers, all who would have to be extremely well trained, is a reasonable step to take to ensure the safety of our children.

Drop the agenda and do the right thing, folks.

Source: TheBlaze