There were some people who believed Christine Blasey Ford was under a hypnotic trance during her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
— KenWeaverII (@nostrilmandias) September 30, 2018
However, a Ford research article from 2008 included a study on self-hypnosis, meant to “retrieve important memories and create artificial situations.”
Yes. Meant to CREATE ARTIFICIAL SITUATIONS.
BREAKING: This is HUGE (waiting for permission to h/t): One of Christine Ford Blasey's research articles in 2008 included a study in which participants were TAUGHT SELF-HYPNOSIS & noted hypnosis is used to retrieve important memories "AND CREATE ARTIFICAL SITUATIONS." pic.twitter.com/11n1JVnArM
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) October 1, 2018
Ford said she was a “research psychologist.”
There’s a big problem.
The state of California, where Ford lives, apparently has no records of this.
EXCLUSIVE: Under oath, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘research psychologist.’ But records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s… https://t.co/t4qzG0rwRv
— John Leksander (@JohnLeksander) September 28, 2018
Just one sentence into her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford may have told a lie.
The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law.
Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.
According to records, Ford is not licensed in the state of California. A recent search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau, which provides a state-run database of all licensed psychologists in California, produced no results for any variation of spelling on Ford’s name. If Ford at one time had a license but it is now inactive, she would legally still be allowed to call herself a “psychologist” but forbidden from practicing psychology on patients until it was renewed. However, the database would have shown any past licenses granted to Ford, even if they were inactive.
Ford also does not appear to have been licensed in any other states outside California. Since graduating with a PhD in educational psychology from the University of Southern California in 1996 it does not appear Ford has spent any significant amount of time outside the state. She married her husband in California in 2002, and completed a master’s degree in California in 2009. She reportedly completed an internship in Hawaii, but a search of Hawaii’s Board of Psychology licensing database also did not turn up any results for Ford.
What makes Ford’s claim even more suspicious is someone affiliated with Stanford University appears to have also been aware of the potentially damning use of the word “psychologist” and rushed to cover for Ford. DANGEROUS exclusively uncovered an archived version of Ford’s page on the school’s faculty directory. On September 10, 2015, the only archived date available, Ford’s faculty page was saved to the Wayback Machine and showed Ford listed as a “research psychologist” along with her email address and office phone number.
My Hero today #ChristineBlaseyFord
This image is imbedded in my mind forever.
My tears started flowing the minute she stood and raised her hand. pic.twitter.com/FgbaKXnwaY
— Mary (@loistoyou) September 28, 2018