Kavanaugh Accuser’s Polygraph Test Revealed — PROVES She’s Been Lying

Christine Blasey Ford, the first of numerous women to accuse SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, will most likely testify Thursday before the Senate.

On Wednesday, her polygraph test was revealed.

Inconsistencies abounded – to say the least.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Great American Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Warren Digs Deeper Hole, Goes On DISTURBING Trump Rant After Shoddy DNA Test

To be even more blunt, it would appear Ford has been caught lying dead to rights.

From Daily Caller:

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s polygraph exam was released on Wednesday, and it reveals another inconsistency in her claim about an alleged assault by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

In her handwritten statement included in her polygraph, Ford claims that there were “4 boys and a couple of girls at the party.”

Ford claims that Kavanaugh pushed her into a bedroom, groped her and covered her mouth with his hand to prevent her from screaming at a party during high school. The party was alleged to have occurred in the early 1980s.

More from Right Scoop:

1. Note the date on the Polygraph: August 7th. According to Ford’s original letter to Feinstein, she said:

I am currently vacationing in the mid-Atlantic until August 7th and will be in California after August 10th.

So did her ship return in time for her to perform a polygraph? Did she have to fly to Maryland from wherever her ship came in? If so, I thought she didn’t like to fly???

Ford was asked only two questions during the test, neither of which were directly related to Kavanaugh specifically:

But what’s interesting is that she never mentioned Brett’s last name. She only mentioned ‘Brett’ and ‘Mark’ in her statement:

One of the greatest things about being an American is you are always presumed innocent until proven guilty.

To Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that isn’t the case when talking about Kavanaugh.

To Schumer, the judge is not to be presumed innocent.

From The Blaze:

“You have to diametrically opposed stories, and there are two issues,” Schumer explained. “A, which story is right, and if, if, uhm, Dr. Ford is telling the truth then Judge Kavanaugh’s credibility is in great question.”

[…]

“I agree that we, this is not, that’s a criminal trial,” he responded. “What I believe is that we should get to the bottom and find the facts in the way that the FBI has always done.”

“There’s no presumption of innocence or guilt when you have a nominee before you,” he concluded.

Stay tuned for more…

John S.
God, family, country, politics, baseball.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.