BREAKING: Senate Talks With Two Men Who Say THEY Assaulted Ford, NOT KAVANAUGH

The Christine Blasey Ford situation just took one heck of a left turn.

According to sources, two men have been interviewed by the Senate Judiciary committee who say they, not SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh, may have assaulted Ford all those years ago.

You can’t make this stuff up.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Great American Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Ocasio-Cortez Makes Terrifying Threat To Run For President, Then Embarrassingly Fails When Quoting Constitution.

And merely hours before Ford is set to testify before the Senate? WILD.

From Daily Wire:

The Senate Judiciary Committee reportedly met with two men this week who think that they assaulted Christie Blasey Ford in 1982, not Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Politico congressional reporter Burgess Everett reported the summary from the Judiciary Committee, which stated: “Committee staff have a second interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in the summer of 1982 that is the basis of her allegation. He described his recollection of their interaction in some detail.”

Back in July, an adviser for Blasey Ford teased that a “strategy will emerge” regarding ending Kavanaugh’s chances at being confirmed to the Supreme Court.

The audio has now been released.

From American Mirror:

Back in July, the American Constitution Society held a conference call about the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, and a clip of it was released by the GOP on Thursday.

In the call, Democratic operative Ricki Seidman cautioned participants to stay tuned, despite the partisan makeup of the Senate seemingly being against them.

Continued:

“While I think at the outset, looking at the numbers in the Senate, it’s not extremely likely that the nominee can be defeated. I would absolutely withhold judgement as the process goes on. I think that I would not reach any conclusion about the outcome in advance,” Seidman says in the recording.

Was she teasing a post-hearing surprise that was triggered by Sen. Dianne Feinstein?

LISTEN – start at the 3:20 mark:

Not only do liberals not want Brett Kavanaugh confirmed to the Supreme Court, but they’re willing to do whatever it takes to make sure his life is destroyed – including threating the lives of his wife and young daughters.

From Daily Caller:

The wife of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has received a battery of death threats in recent days, after allegations appeared in the press that the judge sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford in 1982.

The vivid missives are just one iteration of the inflamed rhetoric surrounding Kavanaugh’s nomination to the high court, following Ford’s accusations. The Ford family has similarly been threatened.

“May you, your husband and your kids burn in hell,” one message to Ashley Kavanaugh read.

Another told Mrs. Kavanaugh to put a bullet in her husband’s skull.

Stay tuned…

John S.
God, family, country, politics, baseball.
You Might Like

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.