The FBI is supposed to be the nation’s top law enforcement agency and is expected to be the top example of not only enforcing the laws of the land but also the example for every other law enforcement agency in the land.
Under the administration of Barack Obama, the FBI, along with its parent agency the Department of Justice, set the worst example of lawlessness in the nation’s history. They regularly violated federal laws, protected known criminals, ordered the release of criminals, ordered the halt to investigations into known criminals, while abusing their power to persecute law-abiding citizens and even good law enforcement officers like former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. He was persecuted and prosecuted by Obama’s crooked DOJ for daring to investigate Barack Obama’s birth certificate.
Under former FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of her private unsecured email server and email account concluded that Clinton had done no wrong when the evidence of her guilt was overwhelming. Between the time Comey was fired by President Donald Trump and the confirmation of Christopher Wray as the new FBI, McCabe was Acting director. McCabe’s wife ran for a Virginia state senate seat in 2015 as a Democrat and received about $750,000 in campaign donations from Hillary Clinton supporters. This was legal grounds for McCabe to recuse himself from the Clinton investigation, but he didn’t and it’s been alleged that he was a major contributor in the FBI letter that exonerated Clinton.
Prior to Comey being Director of the FBI, current Special Counsel Robert Mueller was the Director and it was under his leadership that the FBI investigated the Uranium One deal. In spite of overwhelming evidence of bribery and money laundering and involved members of Obama administration and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, the FBI investigation was buried and hidden.
In recent weeks, we have learned about secret societies being formed, one within the FBI and one within the DOJ, of loyal Democrats for the purposes of sabotaging the presidency of Donald Trump. Additionally, a treasure trove of texts messages between FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page were uncovered that demonstrated strong anti-Trump sentiments between the two lovers and indications of the same anti-Trump sentiments within the FBI, from still loyal Democrats.
Knowing all of this, how would you answer the following question:
“Should a special prosecutor be named to investigate whether senior FBI officials handled the investigations of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in a legal and unbiased fashion?”
That question was posed to likely voters in a recent Rasmussen Reports survey. They reported:
“The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 49% of Likely U.S. Voters believe a special prosecutor should be named to investigate whether senior FBI officials handled the investigation of Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump in a legal and unbiased fashion. Thirty-one percent (31%) disagree, but a sizable 19% are not sure. (To see survey question wording.”
“Sixty-two percent (62%) of Republicans are calling for an outside prosecutor to investigate the FBI, as is a plurality (49%) of voters not affiliated with either major political party. Among Democrats, 38% favor a special prosecutor; 40% are opposed, but 22% are undecided.”
To be honest, I was surprised to see how many Democrats did favor a special prosecutor to investigate the FBI, especially when that number is nearly equal to the number of Democrats who opposed the idea. One can only hope that this is a sign that more Democratic voters are becoming aware of just hope corrupt their Party has become.
Personally, I believe a special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the FBI, another one to investigate Hillary Clinton and the DNC and yet another one to investigate Barack Obama.