Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

The anti-American policies of the Obama administration catered more to illegal foreigners than it did to American citizens. Not only did Barack Obama illegally protect millions of illegals with his executive orders and memos, but his administration allowed many cities, counties and even a state to openly defy federal immigration laws by declaring themselves to be sanctuary locations for illegal aliens.

In these sanctuary locations, officials and law enforcement refuse to comply with federal immigration enforcement agents. They often turn illegal aliens loose after being arrested for other crimes so they can victimize someone else, as is often the case.

In the vast majority of instances, the city, local or state officials who decide and vote for sanctuary status are neo-com Democrats who are more interested in protecting a segment of potential voters (illegal voters) than are in protecting their own American citizens.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump vowed to end sanctuary cities, claiming they are illegal. Democrats began to prepare to defend their illegal actions. After being elected to the White House, Trump has tried to end sanctuary locations.

He tried to cut all federal money going to sanctuary locations, but neo-com judges abused their positions on the bench and blocked Trump’s effort.

Then, Attorney General Jeff Sessions tried to withhold money to cities that was designated to help law enforcement agencies. Once again, neo-com judges decided to use their position to push their anti-American agenda to block Sessions’ actions.

On Monday, US District Judge William Orrick III issued a permanent blockage of Sessions’ actions. In his ruling, Orrick wrote:

“The defendants are permanently enjoined from enforcing Section 9(a) of the Executive Order against jurisdictions they deem as sanctuary jurisdictions. Because Section 9(a) is unconstitutional on its face, and not simply in its application to the plaintiffs here, a nationwide injunction against the defendants other than President Trump is appropriate.”

It should be noted that Orrick was appointed to the federal court by none other than Barack Obama. He serves as a judge on the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, one of the more liberal courts in all of America.

Clearly, Judge Orrick has no idea of what is and isn’t constitutional. Isn’t the willful defiance of federal law and federal law enforcement agents unlawful and unconstitutional?

That’s all Attorney General Jeff Sessions needs to end sanctuary areas and once and for all.

What would happen to you if you were caught harboring or protecting a criminal? What would happen to you if law enforcement officials discovered that you helped someone break the law?

In both cases, you would face criminal charges for aiding a known fugitive from justice and being complicit to the commission of a crime. Both offenses would be felony charges and likely to get you time in prison.

So, it doesn’t apply to what politicians who vote to make their jurisdiction a ‘sanctuary’ location for illegal aliens?

They are called illegal aliens because they violated federal immigration laws by how they entered America and every day they remain in the US, they are guilty of violating federal laws. Therefore, officials who vote to harbor illegals and to allow them to remain as illegals, are just as guilty as the illegals and therefore should be charged with being complicit to the crimes, arrested, tried convicted and jailed.

If every politician who votes for sanctuary status is arrested and convicted, it would end sanctuary cities, counties and states for good. All Sessions and the DOJ have to do is enforce the law, which is his job as Attorney General.




Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.



Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×