Obama AG Lynch Ignores Questions on Clinton During House Interrogation

Can you name any member of Obama’s Cabinet that wasn’t corrupt or crooked? Don’t you dare list former US Attorney General Loretta Lynch as she is far from being innocent.

Lynch was called to meet privately with members of the House Intelligent Committee to answer questions about the allegations of Russian meddling in the election. While on Capitol Hill, Lynch was asked several questions about her infamous meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport in June 2016. However, Lynch ignored all questions pertaining to the Clinton meeting.

The controversy surrounding that meeting lies with the fact that only days afterward, the FBI Director James Comey announced that Clinton was not guilty of any wrongdoing concerning her use of a private email server.

Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch met with members of the House Intelligence Committee on Friday as part of the probe looking into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Trending: July Economic Report Should Spell Doom for Democrats

Lynch is one of several former Obama officials who have been called to Congress for closed-door questioning over the Russia accusations.

But sources close to the investigation told Fox News that questions over her infamous tarmac meeting with President Bill Clinton also may have been on the agenda. That June 27, 2016 meeting with Clinton on an airport tarmac in Phoenix raised questions about whether Lynch – or the Justice Department – could be impartial in the Hillary Clinton email investigation…

When Comey testified before a congressional committee earlier this year, some members of the committee claimed that he may have provided evidence of obstruction of justice on the part of Lynch. Comey testified that shortly after Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton in Phoenix, that she asked Comey to keep the FBI investigation on Hillary quiet, and many see that as pure obstruction. Hopefully, someday, someone will have the courage to file charges against her for it.




Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.